↓ Skip to main content

Safety and Tolerability of Adoptive Cell Therapy in Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Safety, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Safety and Tolerability of Adoptive Cell Therapy in Cancer
Published in
Drug Safety, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40264-018-0779-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benita Wolf, Stefan Zimmermann, Caroline Arber, Melita Irving, Lionel Trueb, George Coukos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#10,543,825
of 13,237,907 outputs
Outputs from Drug Safety
#1,109
of 1,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,447
of 277,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Safety
#19
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,237,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.