↓ Skip to main content

Lessons from the Interagency Emergency Health Kit for access to essential medicines in Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Lessons from the Interagency Emergency Health Kit for access to essential medicines in Canada
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41018-019-0049-8
Authors

Adam R. Houston, Jason W. Nickerson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,191,697
of 16,522,185 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#27
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,061
of 339,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,522,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them