↓ Skip to main content

Paleo-stress orientations and magnitudes from triaxial testing and stress inversion analysis in Nankai accretionary prism sediments

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Paleo-stress orientations and magnitudes from triaxial testing and stress inversion analysis in Nankai accretionary prism sediments
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40645-018-0249-7
Authors

Yoshitaka Hashimoto, Michael Stipp, Jonathan C. Lewis, Frank Wuttke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 25%
Unspecified 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#13,175,705
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#205
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,026
of 467,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.