↓ Skip to main content

The impact of a user’s biases on interactions with virtual humans and learning during virtual emergency management training

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Technology Research & Development, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
The impact of a user’s biases on interactions with virtual humans and learning during virtual emergency management training
Published in
Educational Technology Research & Development, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11423-019-09647-6
Authors

Sarah A. Zipp, Scotty D. Craig

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 43%
Psychology 1 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,009,924
of 13,454,271 outputs
Outputs from Educational Technology Research & Development
#177
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,537
of 386,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Technology Research & Development
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,454,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.