↓ Skip to main content

China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics
Published in
Scientometrics, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11192-011-0376-z
Authors

Li Tang, Philip Shapira

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 3 4%
Egypt 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 59 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 33%
Computer Science 11 16%
Engineering 8 12%
Unspecified 6 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 9%
Other 14 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,748,954
of 12,799,521 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#719
of 1,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,017
of 335,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#15
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,799,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.