↓ Skip to main content

High-flow oxygen therapy in tracheostomized patients at high risk of weaning failure

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
High-flow oxygen therapy in tracheostomized patients at high risk of weaning failure
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0482-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tania Stripoli, Savino Spadaro, Rosa Di mussi, Carlo Alberto Volta, Paolo Trerotoli, Francesca De Carlo, Rachele Iannuzziello, Fabio Sechi, Paola Pierucci, Francesco Staffieri, Francesco Bruno, Luigi Camporota, Salvatore Grasso

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Other 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 60%
Unspecified 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2019.
All research outputs
#12,473,145
of 14,104,163 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#558
of 618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,826
of 368,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#95
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,104,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.