↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic astaxanthin is significantly inferior to algal-based astaxanthin as an antioxidant and may not be suitable as a human nutraceutical supplement

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrafoods, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Synthetic astaxanthin is significantly inferior to algal-based astaxanthin as an antioxidant and may not be suitable as a human nutraceutical supplement
Published in
Nutrafoods, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13749-013-0051-5
Authors

Bob Capelli, Debasis Bagchi, Gerald R. Cysewski

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 26%
Student > Master 15 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Unspecified 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 44%
Unspecified 9 15%
Engineering 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Chemical Engineering 5 8%
Other 8 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,117,742
of 13,205,256 outputs
Outputs from Nutrafoods
#1
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,129
of 323,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrafoods
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,205,256 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them