↓ Skip to main content

Circulating tumor cells as an independent prognostic factor in advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective study in 121 patients

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Colorectal Disease, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Circulating tumor cells as an independent prognostic factor in advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective study in 121 patients
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00384-018-03223-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lili Wang, Shichao Zhou, Wenying Zhang, Jiongyi Wang, Meiling Wang, Xiaohua Hu, Feng Liu, Yanjie Zhang, Bin Jiang, Haihua Yuan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#9,961,008
of 13,020,564 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#632
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,521
of 313,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,020,564 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.