↓ Skip to main content

Embodied meaning: a systemic functional perspective on paralanguage

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Linguistics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Embodied meaning: a systemic functional perspective on paralanguage
Published in
Functional Linguistics, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40554-018-0065-9
Authors

J. R. Martin, Michele Zappavigna

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 15 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 22 44%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#11,198,328
of 14,122,258 outputs
Outputs from Functional Linguistics
#26
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,110
of 368,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Linguistics
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,122,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.