RT @SpringerEthics: Minerva Variation in Valuation: How Research Groups Accumulate Credibility in Four Epistemic Cultures https://t.co/…
Minerva Variation in Valuation: How Research Groups Accumulate Credibility in Four Epistemic Cultures https://t.co/Se5VwAIvYG
RT @Research_Voice: "In some cultures, journal publications are the main source of recognition, but in others one can earn significant amou…
"In some cultures, journal publications are the main source of recognition, but in others one can earn significant amounts of recognition for #conference contributions or service to the #academic community" https://t.co/iePJjyM5l6 #geoscience #humanities
RT @wmijnhardt: Disciplinary variation in valuation practices via the lens of the Credibility Cycle: How high-performing research groups ac…
RT @wmijnhardt: Disciplinary variation in valuation practices via the lens of the Credibility Cycle: How high-performing research groups ac…
RT @wmijnhardt: Disciplinary variation in valuation practices via the lens of the Credibility Cycle: How high-performing research groups ac…
RT @wmijnhardt: Disciplinary variation in valuation practices via the lens of the Credibility Cycle: How high-performing research groups ac…
RT @wmijnhardt: Disciplinary variation in valuation practices via the lens of the Credibility Cycle: How high-performing research groups ac…
RT @wmijnhardt: Disciplinary variation in valuation practices via the lens of the Credibility Cycle: How high-performing research groups ac…
Disciplinary variation in valuation practices via the lens of the Credibility Cycle: How high-performing research groups accumulate credibility in humanities, social sciences, geosciences and mathematics via @laurenshessels @sarahderijcke https://t.co/Fys