↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of log Kow (n-octanol–water partition coefficient) values for non-ionic, anionic, cationic and amphoteric surfactants determined using predictions and experimental methods

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Sciences Europe, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of log Kow (n-octanol–water partition coefficient) values for non-ionic, anionic, cationic and amphoteric surfactants determined using predictions and experimental methods
Published in
Environmental Sciences Europe, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12302-018-0176-7
Authors

Geoff Hodges, Charles Eadsforth, Bart Bossuyt, Alain Bouvy, Marie-Helene Enrici, Marc Geurts, Matthias Kotthoff, Eleanor Michie, Dennis Miller, Josef Müller, Gunter Oetter, Jayne Roberts, Diederik Schowanek, Ping Sun, Joachim Venzmer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 41 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 22 18%
Engineering 13 10%
Environmental Science 11 9%
Chemical Engineering 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 49 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,852,360
of 23,383,275 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#161
of 587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,130
of 440,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,383,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.