↓ Skip to main content

Neurolaw in Australia: The Use of Neuroscience in Australian Criminal Proceedings

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroethics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Neurolaw in Australia: The Use of Neuroscience in Australian Criminal Proceedings
Published in
Neuroethics, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12152-018-09395-z
Authors

Armin Alimardani, Jason Chin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Psychology 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Neuroscience 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,194,978
of 13,232,126 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#285
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,689
of 324,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,232,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them