↓ Skip to main content

Neurolaw in Australia: The Use of Neuroscience in Australian Criminal Proceedings

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroethics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Neurolaw in Australia: The Use of Neuroscience in Australian Criminal Proceedings
Published in
Neuroethics, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12152-018-09395-z
Authors

Armin Alimardani, Jason Chin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 26%
Social Sciences 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,707,976
of 25,362,520 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#61
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,601
of 448,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.