↓ Skip to main content

Argumentation Theory for Mathematical Argument

Overview of attention for article published in Argumentation, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Argumentation Theory for Mathematical Argument
Published in
Argumentation, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10503-018-9474-x
Authors

Joseph Corneli, Ursula Martin, Dave Murray-Rust, Gabriela Rino Nesin, Alison Pease

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 6 19%
Computer Science 3 10%
Linguistics 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 14 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,652,162
of 25,934,224 outputs
Outputs from Argumentation
#62
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,364
of 448,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Argumentation
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.