↓ Skip to main content

Induction of apoptosis by in vitro and in vivo plant extracts derived from Menyanthes trifoliata L. in human cancer cells

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Cell Science, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Induction of apoptosis by in vitro and in vivo plant extracts derived from Menyanthes trifoliata L. in human cancer cells
Published in
Methods in Cell Science, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10616-018-0274-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomasz Kowalczyk, Przemysław Sitarek, Ewa Skała, Monika Toma, Marzena Wielanek, Dariusz Pytel, Joanna Wieczfińska, Janusz Szemraj, Tomasz Śliwiński

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Researcher 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 21 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 23 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,526,423
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#760
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,016
of 445,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.