↓ Skip to main content

Interpreting mutual adjustment for multiple indicators of socioeconomic position without committing mutual adjustment fallacies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Interpreting mutual adjustment for multiple indicators of socioeconomic position without committing mutual adjustment fallacies
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-6364-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Green, Frank Popham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 36%
Researcher 5 36%
Unspecified 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Unspecified 5 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2019.
All research outputs
#985,175
of 12,939,528 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,123
of 8,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,978
of 310,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#188
of 1,096 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,939,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,096 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.