| Title |
Accounting for the Moral Significance of Technology: Revisiting the Case of Non-Medical Sex Selection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11673-018-9891-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olya Kudina |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 38% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 11% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 24% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,594,400
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#206
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,617
of 437,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.