| Title |
Tranexamic acid for the prevention of postpartum bleeding in women with anaemia: study protocol for an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-018-3081-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katharine Ker, Ian Roberts, Rizwana Chaudhri, Bukola Fawole, Danielle Beaumont, Eni Balogun, Danielle Prowse, Tracey Pepple, Kiran Javaid, Aasia Kayani, Sabaratnam Arulkumaran, Imelda Bates, Haleema Shakur-Still |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 168 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 60 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 68 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,149,234
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#458
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,706
of 449,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them