The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Nocturnal foraging by great skuas Stercorarius skua: implications for conservation of storm-petrel populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-005-0021-9 |
| Authors |
Stephen C. Votier, Jonathan E. Crane, Stuart Bearhop, Ana de León, Claire A. McSorley, Eduardo Mínguez, Ian P. Mitchell, Matthew Parsons, Richard A. Phillips, Robert W. Furness |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 67% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,468,655
of 26,290,653 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#648
of 1,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,318
of 84,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,290,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them