Deciphering the Palimpsest: Studying the Relationship Between Morphological Integration and Phenotypic Covariation

RT @incisorial: Posting this paper (Hallgrimson et al. 2009) for no particular reason again today: https://t.co/pRGQzuPS4O

Posting this paper (Hallgrimson et al. 2009) for no particular reason again today: https://t.co/pRGQzuPS4O

@bolt_carl @_mamadeb @FrankDElia7 @TakethatCt @carlsmythe @CoralBlob @AndrewLazarus4 @ghoppe @pawley_robert @Top_Muppetries @stevenmosher @Suesue2point0 @ffuunntweetz @krebiozen @DPBeachNY @volpiranyas @absolutelyallan @Monstercoyliar @crabb_vicki @vault_c

@ent3c Sure thing. The palimpsest model/middle out approach uses the distinction between variation (what you see) and variability (what you might see) to demonstrate that you need to understand developmental systems to understand genetic effects. https:

We think this result tells us that population structural covariance norms are "baked in" to the developmental processes that shape the human brain in childhood and adolescence. Our thinking here is highly influenced by the work of @Benedikt_H https://t.co

@jacanamama @brown_birds Hallgrimsson et al. 2009 might be what you're looking for? https://t.co/pRGQzv7sWm

@yoginho Have you seen this one from Benedikt Hallgrimsson's group? Another interesting take on ontogeny. https://t.co/vTbXwE5kG7

@aigverte @evolvwing @zapkapow Very cool looking pre-print! For those interested, here is the origin of palimpsest in a developmental context: https://t.co/9r3AeFjCFq