Title |
Nasal high-flow bronchodilator nebulization: a randomized cross-over study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-018-0473-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
François Reminiac, Laurent Vecellio, Laetitia Bodet-Contentin, Valérie Gissot, Deborah Le Pennec, Charlotte Salmon Gandonnière, Maria Cabrera, Pierre-François Dequin, Laurent Plantier, Stephan Ehrmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 7 | 50% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
Belgium | 1 | 7% |
Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 8 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,791,870
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#343
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,171
of 435,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#12
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.