↓ Skip to main content

African bioethics: methodological doubts and insights

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
African bioethics: methodological doubts and insights
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12910-018-0338-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Barugahare

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 22%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Psychology 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 21 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,735,922
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#288
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,677
of 437,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.