@Samuel_Gregson Is that why she lived so long 🤔 https://t.co/RoVAQSqmGs @DevanSinha is this 👇 result credible?
@xabitron1 Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals https://t.co/5CW8cE9Qnp
@denisrancourt @AndrePitre_LUX Le data de l'exposition à la radiation et le % de cancer lui ? Depuis le temps https://t.co/zBkX3Ux3nc https://t.co/yruFZY1P9I https://t.co/LTJB5skWF5
@trumpi_nator @DocDentN @VeroWendland @andreasnukechem @MoormannRainer @Rainer_Klute @DualFluid @Bjoern_Peters @s04paps gibt sogar Paper, die bei den A-Bomb Survivors Hormesis Effekte postulieren https://t.co/nyNbKYtgem
@Maron77th @holisticgrenade Linear no threshold model is so ingrained that it has become a scary story for even the uneducated. Fact - Small doses of radiation increase lifespan https://t.co/KNkChP0sTa“Median%20life,more%20rapidly%20at%20high%20doses.
Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals | Genes and Environment | Full Text https://t.co/PvpSkzcYbW
@StefanPaas 1945 atoombommen 200k doden. Afschuwelijk! 350k zwaar bestraalde mensen overleefden. Daarvan leven er nu (79 jaar later) nog 113k. Hun gemiddelde leeftijd: 85,01 jaar. Gem levensverwachting onbestraalde Jappen: 84 jaar! A-Bom verlengt leven! ht
@nilnil03663090 @Grady_Booch Actually Japan lost the War, but won longer lifespan for those not directly exposed to radiation. https://t.co/6q6bHStGei. https://t.co/K8BzWoGu6y
feelsgoodman https://t.co/LuqCnypNpq
@PGDynes This water is harmless. LNT is just scare tactics https://t.co/4JmFtmtJIQ
@golrizghahraman Get with real science. LNT has no scientific basis The level radiation release does no harm. https://t.co/O32lktctuC Low dose can extend life https://t.co/p8RsmuqbkF
Guys, they've had a cure for cancer all along. It's called 'being nuked': https://t.co/63iNnt6cgs
@antunes_morgado @greg_barton @collectifission Here is one critique of the papers based on INWORKS. There are a number of issues with these studies. https://t.co/4Q7RO8jJdx This is another solid review of the state of the science: https://t.co/IHVJt9WpW
@TedNordhaus @EnergyJvd @TheBTI Maybe this helps: https://t.co/91dRK0PqYa
@ShibaUprising @r_hartman @JoshWalkos This all is surely unethical, but I am happy to know that these radiation experiments in so far as small doses were used have shown that radiation is not very dangerous. That also goes for the atomic bomb: https://t.co
@tonygill3 @Nuclearjunkie https://t.co/tQLB8icszK https://t.co/i4ns05VMCo https://t.co/7fTM7DWgcC https://t.co/OQD9y1kico https://t.co/VLzVVFmJZs Please show me one instance where a person got cancer or died from ARS from drinking tritium water and we
@Stephen57908892 @Nukegate @radiationreason 2018 study on the data here , https://t.co/afew6O2q66 Wade Allison wrote two excellent books on the fear of radiation,
@gms111 @hkrugertjie You're the one denying science just because you're emotional. https://t.co/A52m2GzQqH
@gms111 @hkrugertjie He didn't just survive, he thrived. His siblings died at 64, 54, and 51. His dad died at 58. A 75% increase in life span is pretty significant. https://t.co/ELwRE3xR7a
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @totterdell91: Yes #Auspol, We need that 24/7 Reliable, ULTRA Clean electricity from #Nuclear Energy, Small Modular Reactors #SMR & our…
RT @totterdell91: Yes #Auspol, We need that 24/7 Reliable, ULTRA Clean electricity from #Nuclear Energy, Small Modular Reactors #SMR & our…
Yes #Auspol, We need that 24/7 Reliable, ULTRA Clean electricity from #Nuclear Energy, Small Modular Reactors #SMR & our abundant #Thorium. We need #NuclearEnergy! Australia needs to #Repeal140A https://t.co/rFcawv9eCl
@Unplugnukes A small amount of radiation can be good for you. https://t.co/XlTQiXDWkG
"I'll bet you didn't know …" https://t.co/Amnx0yf1MY or https://t.co/wk2BtPZmnF #nuclear #uranium #thorium #repeal140A #auspol #AusPol2023 https://t.co/oDj2rMc01X
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @HopfJames: Interesting result! I'm not sure about hormesis, and would never base policy on it, but I do believe that threshholds (belo…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @JohnLovell60: Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals ...…
Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals ... https://t.co/h2rlBjAlkO
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @HopfJames: Interesting result! I'm not sure about hormesis, and would never base policy on it, but I do believe that threshholds (belo…
Nach der Logik haben Atombombentests durch eine Art Strahlen-Immunisierung bei niedrigen Dosen effektiv sogar Menschenleben gerettet. Absolut faszinierend.
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
Interesting result! I'm not sure about hormesis, and would never base policy on it, but I do believe that threshholds (below which no measurable impacts are seen) should be used. 1/2
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
Radiation hormesis? Either low level radiation doses are: - linearly dangerous (1st graph), - dangerous to a point below which we don't need to bother (2nd), - or actually slightly beneficial (3rd). Here's an article showing that the 3rd one might be cor
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
RT @Atomicrod: I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs…
I'll bet you didn't know that NIH published a peer-reviewed study 5 years ago showing that "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals" https://t.co/5BSFjpKb4F
2/n This might have contributed to some degree, but apparently some other important factor has an influence: low-dose radiation stimulates human biological defense mechanisms." https://t.co/aZprsRRfNl
@keerti_007 @ajwillshire Ask and ye shall receive…. “When LSS data of longevity are examined, a clear J-shaped dose-response, a hallmark of radiation hormesis, is apparent. https://t.co/ty1m687PMN
RT @GRITCULT: increased low level background radiation is actually good for you your body gets used to it & adapts via hormesis, over prot…
RT @GRITCULT: increased low level background radiation is actually good for you your body gets used to it & adapts via hormesis, over prot…
RT @GRITCULT: increased low level background radiation is actually good for you your body gets used to it & adapts via hormesis, over prot…
RT @GRITCULT: increased low level background radiation is actually good for you your body gets used to it & adapts via hormesis, over prot…
RT @GRITCULT: increased low level background radiation is actually good for you your body gets used to it & adapts via hormesis, over prot…
increased low level background radiation is actually good for you your body gets used to it & adapts via hormesis, over protects you https://t.co/CcX4OagsPP this is a paper on those affected by atom bombs and their longer life spans it also found th
@azzarVSOP Need to be careful interpreting this data base on the NAS LNT hypothesis. It doesn't seem to stack up. Low levels of exposure increases lifespan https://t.co/kazFANKag0
@Grady_Booch FYI, Lost the WAR but WON longer life span ? REAL SCI-FI ? https://t.co/iGpOJVbCCM
@Terri66987597 Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated (Japanese) lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals. Not all exposed to low dose. Reference: https://t.co/G9ryxys4fu https://t.co/NjxSMHlvl0
اليابانيين الناجين من القنبلة النووية عاشوا 5 سنوات أطول من اليابانيين الآخرين وكانوا أقل عرضة للإصابة بالسرطان! https://t.co/RXk9umzHA3
Japanese atom bomb survivors lived five years longer and were less likely to get cancer than average Japanese citizens. https://t.co/LW8HboaSsh
In a more reasonable world, this study would spell the end of the anti-nuclear movement https://t.co/NmomNPdQkp
日本原子弹爆炸幸存者比普通日本公民平均寿命多五年,且患癌概率更小。 https://t.co/THauDgYRjW
Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals | Genes and Environment | Full Text https://t.co/uQyXRKCZDI
Someone please explain. https://t.co/ucl4VWlpA6
Zajímavost: Japonci, kteří přežili atomovou bombu, žili o pět let déle a měli menší pravděpodobnost, že onemocní rakovinou, než průměrní japonští občané. Selection bas/survival bias? https://t.co/SBdCNKjIeI
@elonmusk I remembered this tweet when I recently read this article https://t.co/sGrQq1Cv10
Thread🧵 unrolled: https://t.co/BsGQglBJoX
I knew it‼️ I didn’t have any prior justification — it just felt right intuitively ☢️
Turns out X-men is real https://t.co/6vqHZzxDhB
RT @ellegist: very cool: exposure to radiation from an atom bomb is net beneficial to health (some caveats) https://t.co/BMKaMy8F1C
RT @ellegist: very cool: exposure to radiation from an atom bomb is net beneficial to health (some caveats) https://t.co/BMKaMy8F1C
I think Ann Coulter was ahead of the curve here https://t.co/LdubsL2vfP
RT @ellegist: very cool: exposure to radiation from an atom bomb is net beneficial to health (some caveats) https://t.co/BMKaMy8F1C
RT @ellegist: very cool: exposure to radiation from an atom bomb is net beneficial to health (some caveats) https://t.co/BMKaMy8F1C
wut !?!
very cool: exposure to radiation from an atom bomb is net beneficial to health (some caveats) https://t.co/BMKaMy8F1C
Is this for real?? low dose radiation has possible therapeutic effect?? https://t.co/piNV5vn7dz
المصدر https://t.co/wwcx5Ove4g
RT @nistheword: "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals" ht…
"Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals" https://t.co/7JhLhP1onx
Hormesis at work. https://t.co/EqPHRhxW3C
RT @XiXiDu: Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals (Sutou, 2…
@Theophite @ClwnPrncCharlie There's evidence low dose exposure in Nagasaki and Hiroshima extended lifespans. https://t.co/uZE21Pa8rf
@Optimist231 @fwuet @Knutti_ETH @economiesuisse Da machen Sie einen Strohmann. Strahlengrenzwerte sagen per se nichts über die reale Belastung aus. Dass bis 100mSv auf's Mal eher eine positive Wirkung resultiert, wurde durch die Forschung nachgewiesen.
@TDlisle @Leigh_Phillips @FoEAustralia "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals" https://t.co/vCbXZSDMnj
@Tree_Hug_Champ @WR4NYGov @elonmusk And here is another: https://t.co/7RtuWiAPlL
@CeglarM @KRITISde Die Behauptung wird nicht durch Wiederholung wahr. https://t.co/Isb6WIPk32
@Shazzamm1971 @dorfman_p @Forbes "Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals" https://t.co/WZ5a9346tj