@robinnkok @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral @schneiderleonid Did you see that it was retracted? https://t.co/c2yf7qlB9c
Sorry to read that one of my favourite lecturer back in Italy disagreed with a #retraction on #Trials that seems more than justified, after a reviewer was added as a co-author: https://t.co/Dd9wOBjjDR
RT @RetractionWatch: “Concerns have also been raised that one of the reviewers was added to this article as an author after revision.” http…
RT @RetractionWatch: “Concerns have also been raised that one of the reviewers was added to this article as an author after revision.” http…
RT @RetractionWatch: “Concerns have also been raised that one of the reviewers was added to this article as an author after revision.” http…
Hard to believe authors would have the audacity to try adding the referee after review.
RT @RetractionWatch: “Concerns have also been raised that one of the reviewers was added to this article as an author after revision.” http…
RT @RetractionWatch: “Concerns have also been raised that one of the reviewers was added to this article as an author after revision.” http…
RT @RetractionWatch: “Concerns have also been raised that one of the reviewers was added to this article as an author after revision.” http…
RT @RetractionWatch: “Concerns have also been raised that one of the reviewers was added to this article as an author after revision.” http…
“Concerns have also been raised that one of the reviewers was added to this article as an author after revision.” https://t.co/2clIPVtKOq