↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Sacred Mountain of Varallo renaissance complex in Italy: damage analysis of decorated surfaces and structural supports

Overview of attention for article published in Meccanica, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 159)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Sacred Mountain of Varallo renaissance complex in Italy: damage analysis of decorated surfaces and structural supports
Published in
Meccanica, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11012-014-9905-1
Authors

Federico Accornero, Stefano Invernizzi, Giuseppe Lacidogna, Alberto Carpinteri

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2015.
All research outputs
#5,877,389
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Meccanica
#29
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,420
of 220,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Meccanica
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.