↓ Skip to main content

Critical review of the epidemiology literature on the potential cancer risks of methylene chloride

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Critical review of the epidemiology literature on the potential cancer risks of methylene chloride
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, October 1999
DOI 10.1007/s004200050396
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda D. Dell, Kenneth A. Mundt, Margaret McDonald, Joseph P. Tritschler II, Diane J. Mundt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 25%
Professor 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 25%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2009.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#876
of 2,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,571
of 35,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.