↓ Skip to main content

Critical review of the epidemiology literature on the potential cancer risks of methylene chloride

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions
Title
Critical review of the epidemiology literature on the potential cancer risks of methylene chloride
Published in
International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health, October 1999
DOI 10.1007/s004200050396
Authors

Linda D. Dell, Kenneth A. Mundt, Margaret McDonald, Joseph P. Tritschler II, Diane J. Mundt

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2009.
All research outputs
#3,542,970
of 12,330,736 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health
#401
of 1,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,412
of 131,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,330,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,408 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them