↓ Skip to main content

Chronic nonpulsatile blood flow is compatible with normal end-organ function: implications for LVAD development

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Artificial Organs, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 150)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Chronic nonpulsatile blood flow is compatible with normal end-organ function: implications for LVAD development
Published in
Journal of Artificial Organs, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10047-005-0295-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satoshi Saito, Tomohiro Nishinaka

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 45%
Engineering 8 40%
Unspecified 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2007.
All research outputs
#3,542,089
of 12,329,095 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Artificial Organs
#28
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,061
of 132,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Artificial Organs
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,329,095 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them