↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the validity evidence of an OSCE: results from a new medical school

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the validity evidence of an OSCE: results from a new medical school
Published in
BMC Medical Education, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12909-018-1421-x
Authors

Vanda Yazbeck Karam, Yoon Soo Park, Ara Tekian, Nazih Youssef

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Unspecified 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 2 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2018.
All research outputs
#10,443,071
of 13,099,193 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,576
of 1,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,598
of 319,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#289
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,099,193 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.