| Title |
Progress of marine biofouling and antifouling technologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Bulletin, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11434-010-4158-4 |
| Authors |
Shan Cao, JiaDao Wang, HaoSheng Chen, DaRong Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 493 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 4 | <1% |
| Chile | 4 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 479 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 81 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 77 | 16% |
| Researcher | 54 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 10% |
| Unknown | 137 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 18% |
| Engineering | 59 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 51 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 38 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 14% |
| Unknown | 155 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,655,478
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Science Bulletin
#316
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,630
of 190,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Bulletin
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.