Title |
Botanical medicines for the urinary tract
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Urology, October 2002
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00345-002-0293-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eric Yarnell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 215 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 17% |
Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
Researcher | 22 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
Other | 42 | 19% |
Unknown | 50 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 17% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 37 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 16% |
Chemistry | 12 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 13% |
Unknown | 59 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2022.
All research outputs
#466,089
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#16
of 2,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335
of 50,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them