This paper only has 2 references and no open access copy. I guess I'll just have to take your word for it... 🤷♀️ Productivity does not equal usefulness https://t.co/NcSvMEGbFt
Rather meagre conceptualization of useful IMHO https://t.co/J8GU3jGoQV
RT @lutzbornmann: Productivity does not equal usefulness https://t.co/GaGSxwMSc2
RT @angelosalatino: According to @lutzbornmann and Tekles, "hyperprolific” authorship is not a guarantee for usefulness. Scientific progres…
RT @lutzbornmann: Productivity does not equal usefulness https://t.co/GaGSxwMSc2
RT @lutzbornmann: Productivity does not equal usefulness https://t.co/GaGSxwMSc2
RT @angelosalatino: According to @lutzbornmann and Tekles, "hyperprolific” authorship is not a guarantee for usefulness. Scientific progres…
RT @lutzbornmann: Productivity does not equal usefulness https://t.co/GaGSxwMSc2
RT @angelosalatino: According to @lutzbornmann and Tekles, "hyperprolific” authorship is not a guarantee for usefulness. Scientific progres…
“Productividad no es lo mismo que utilidad”
According to @lutzbornmann and Tekles, "hyperprolific” authorship is not a guarantee for usefulness. Scientific progress depends on papers that are able to build sustainable shoulders for future research. #ScienceOfScience https://t.co/te3KY8Mtrh
RT @lutzbornmann: Productivity does not equal usefulness https://t.co/GaGSxwMSc2
RT @lutzbornmann: Productivity does not equal usefulness https://t.co/GaGSxwMSc2
RT @lutzbornmann: Productivity does not equal usefulness https://t.co/GaGSxwMSc2
RT @lutzbornmann: Productivity does not equal usefulness https://t.co/GaGSxwMSc2
RT @lutzbornmann: Productivity does not equal usefulness https://t.co/GaGSxwMSc2
Productivity does not equal usefulness https://t.co/GaGSxwMSc2