@OscardelaCroixS I expressed some of these original ideas in a book review (also you can look at the conceptual diagram of sorting processes at an organismal level) https://t.co/JkUIbFSkhf . Fields C, D, and E are directional evolution which is not driven
RT @AndrejSpiridon4: @Mcdonald77M @ikesharpless @CrispinSartwell As it happenned, I wrote a review about it with the discussion of ramifica…
@Mcdonald77M @ikesharpless @CrispinSartwell As it happenned, I wrote a review about it with the discussion of ramifications of some of his ideas https://t.co/JkUIbFSkhf
@PalaeoPhilo @BUCPHS @wrwveit @Finkelsaurus @derekdturner @philosofir @CogitWho @neohempelian Maybe not exactly about the difficulty, but more about the possibility and consequences of reconstructing umwelts of fossil animals could be found in R. Prum's "T
@DialecticalA @Jente_O There are some points that could be improved, but overall he presented an important contribution to the evolutionary theory. Here is my review of his work with some new ideas on expanding, generalizing, and contextualizing them https
Prum’s Aesthetic Theory of Evolution: Beauty Happens and it can Change a Great Many Things https://t.co/EJnhwvOuWl via @instapaper
RT @Camb_BEgroup: Prum’s Aesthetic Theory of Evolution: Beauty Happens and it can Change a Great Many Things https://t.co/60Jq2oY4B3 #evolu…
Prum’s Aesthetic Theory of Evolution: Beauty Happens and it can Change a Great Many Things https://t.co/60Jq2oY4B3 #evolution #extendedsynthesis
Just out. My recent review of Richard Prum's theory of aesthetic evolution. With discussion on paleontological, biosemiotic and macroevolutionary ramifications. https://t.co/JkUIbFSkhf