@lizthegrey You probably would like to read this paper (German though) https://t.co/5GWTPKEqwn Basically developers can compete to buy and resell a bounty(feature request) in a kind of auction. The incentives are aligned quite well in theory.
@nyharel @RynLinthicum I'm a co-author on a paper that I can't read. (because co-inventor, not author as in text author) https://t.co/aDBp8FMkXd
@daspitzberg @cwlcks https://t.co/aDBp8G3WlN is the latest research on futures markets for incentivizing software quality.
@johnmark @nayafia Agree. This work has inspired and been cited in many places. IMHO incentivization is bigger than just a licensing problem. Here's @GeorgLink et al. https://t.co/aDBp8FMkXd (I'm 1 of the "et al." but the text of this one is all Georg)
New paper on futures markets on open source software cites @ATabarrok's "Dominant Assurance Contracts" for incentivizing public goods.
Not only is this paper #OpenAccess, it's even #responsiveHTML so you can read it on your mobile device instead of having to "send tab" like all the legacy PDF papers. Congratulations, Georg! #openSourceIncentivization