| Title |
Accretion in strong field gravity with eXTP
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11433-018-9297-0 |
| Authors |
Alessandra De Rosa, Phil Uttley, LiJun Gou, Yuan Liu, Cosimo Bambi, Didier Barret, Tomaso Belloni, Emanuele Berti, Stefano Bianchi, Ilaria Caiazzo, Piergiorgio Casella, Marco Feroci, Valeria Ferrari, Leonardo Gualtieri, Jeremy Heyl, Adam Ingram, Vladimir Karas, FangJun Lu, Bin Luo, Giorgio Matt, Sara Motta, Joseph Neilsen, Paolo Pani, Andrea Santangelo, XinWen Shu, JunFeng Wang, Jian-Min Wang, YongQuan Xue, YuPeng Xu, WeiMin Yuan, YeFei Yuan, Shuang-Nan Zhang, Shu Zhang, Ivan Agudo, Lorenzo Amati, Nils Andersson, Cristina Baglio, Pavel Bakala, Altan Baykal, Sudip Bhattacharyya, Ignazio Bombaci, Niccoló Bucciantini, Fiamma Capitanio, Riccardo Ciolfi, Wei K. Cui, Filippo D’Ammando, Thomas Dauser, Melania Del Santo, Barbara De Marco, Tiziana Di Salvo, Chris Done, Michal Dovčiak, Andrew C. Fabian, Maurizio Falanga, Angelo Francesco Gambino, Bruce Gendre, Victoria Grinberg, Alexander Heger, Jeroen Homan, Rosario Iaria, JiaChen Jiang, ChiChuan Jin, Elmar Koerding, Manu Linares, Zhu Liu, Thomas J. Maccarone, Julien Malzac, Antonios Manousakis, Frédéric Marin, Andrea Marinucci, Missagh Mehdipour, Mariano Méndez, Simone Migliari, Cole Miller, Giovanni Miniutti, Emanuele Nardini, Paul T. O’Brien, Julian P. Osborne, Pierre Olivier Petrucci, Andrea Possenti, Alessandro Riggio, Jerome Rodriguez, Andrea Sanna, LiJing Shao, Malgosia Sobolewska, Eva Sramkova, Abigail L. Stevens, Holger Stiele, Giulia Stratta, Zdenek Stuchlik, Jiri Svoboda, Fabrizio Tamburini, Thomas M. Tauris, Francesco Tombesi, Gabriel Torok, Martin Urbanec, Frederic Vincent, QingWen Wu, Feng Yuan, Jean J. M. in’ t Zand, Andrzej A. Zdziarski, XinLin Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 28% |
| Professor | 6 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 29 | 81% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,236,268
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy
#141
of 859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,342
of 450,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.