| Title |
Proportional modes versus pressure support ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-018-0470-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jun Kataoka, Akira Kuriyama, Yasuhiro Norisue, Shigeki Fujitani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 3 | 20% |
| Argentina | 2 | 13% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 26% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,814,682
of 24,066,486 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#440
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,822
of 443,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#15
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,066,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.