↓ Skip to main content

Coffee and tea drinking in relation to the risk of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Coffee and tea drinking in relation to the risk of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00394-018-1874-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raul Zamora-Ros, Muath A. Alghamdi, Valerie Cayssials, Silvia Franceschi, Martin Almquist, Joakim Hennings, Maria Sandström, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Elisabete Weiderpass, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Bodil Hammer Bech, Kim Overvad, Anne Tjønneland, Kristina E. N. Petersen, Francesca Romana Mancini, Yahya Mahamat-Saleh, Fabrice Bonnet, Tilman Kühn, Renée T. Fortner, Heiner Boeing, Antonia Trichopoulou, Christina Bamia, Georgia Martimianaki, Giovanna Masala, Sara Grioni, Salvatore Panico, Rosario Tumino, Francesca Fasanelli, Guri Skeie, Tonje Braaten, Cristina Lasheras, Elena Salamanca-Fernández, Pilar Amiano, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Aurelio Barricarte, Jonas Manjer, Peter Wallström, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Petra H. Peeters, Kay-Thee Khaw, Nicholas J. Wareham, Julie A. Schmidt, Dagfinn Aune, Graham Byrnes, Augustin Scalbert, Antonio Agudo, Sabina Rinaldi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Librarian 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,168,312
of 13,055,201 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#545
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,376
of 320,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,055,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.