↓ Skip to main content

Significance of molecular classification of ependymomas: C11orf95-RELA fusion-negative supratentorial ependymomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Significance of molecular classification of ependymomas: C11orf95-RELA fusion-negative supratentorial ependymomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40478-018-0630-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kohei Fukuoka, Yonehiro Kanemura, Tomoko Shofuda, Shintaro Fukushima, Satoshi Yamashita, Daichi Narushima, Mamoru Kato, Mai Honda-Kitahara, Hitoshi Ichikawa, Takashi Kohno, Atsushi Sasaki, Junko Hirato, Takanori Hirose, Takashi Komori, Kaishi Satomi, Akihiko Yoshida, Kai Yamasaki, Yoshiko Nakano, Ai Takada, Taishi Nakamura, Hirokazu Takami, Yuko Matsushita, Tomonari Suzuki, Hideo Nakamura, Keishi Makino, Yukihiko Sonoda, Ryuta Saito, Teiji Tominaga, Yasuhiro Matsusaka, Keiichi Kobayashi, Motoo Nagane, Takuya Furuta, Mitsutoshi Nakada, Yoshitaka Narita, Yuichi Hirose, Shigeo Ohba, Akira Wada, Katsuyoshi Shimizu, Kazuhiko Kurozumi, Isao Date, Junya Fukai, Yousuke Miyairi, Naoki Kagawa, Atsufumi Kawamura, Makiko Yoshida, Namiko Nishida, Takafumi Wataya, Masayoshi Yamaoka, Naohiro Tsuyuguchi, Takehiro Uda, Mayu Takahashi, Yoshiteru Nakano, Takuya Akai, Shuichi Izumoto, Masahiro Nonaka, Kazuhisa Yoshifuji, Yoshinori Kodama, Masayuki Mano, Tatsuya Ozawa, Vijay Ramaswamy, Michael D. Taylor, Toshikazu Ushijima, Soichiro Shibui, Mami Yamasaki, Hajime Arai, Hiroaki Sakamoto, Ryo Nishikawa, Koichi Ichimura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Unspecified 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Unspecified 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,866,280
of 13,183,153 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#328
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,072
of 326,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#65
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,183,153 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.