Title |
Size–growth asymmetry is not consistently related to productivity across an eastern US temperate forest network
|
---|---|
Published in |
Oecologia, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00442-018-4318-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alex Dye, M. Ross Alexander, Daniel Bishop, Daniel Druckenbrod, Neil Pederson, Amy Hessl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 75% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 18% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 27% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,190,353
of 24,592,508 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,215
of 4,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,747
of 446,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#29
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,592,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.