RT @SpringerEthics: Minerva The Perception of Scientific Authorship Across Domains https://t.co/I9C0ympBDZ
Minerva The Perception of Scientific Authorship Across Domains https://t.co/I9C0ympBDZ
RT @MattGrossmann: Co-authorship is rising across disciplines, but there are very different scholar & journal perceptions of who should cou…
now full-text view-only (at least) available :) https://t.co/KGOsdNcWIQ
RT @MattGrossmann: Co-authorship is rising across disciplines, but there are very different scholar & journal perceptions of who should cou…
Co-authorship is rising across disciplines, but there are very different scholar & journal perceptions of who should count as an author, limiting comparisons of scholars: https://t.co/9Gq8eKxooj https://t.co/B9Rm0w7TPg
If you ever wondered how a paper can have more than 5,000 authors, then you're probably not a high-energy physicist! Joint paper with D. Johann @SurveyAcademics on authorship perceptions across scientific domains: https://t.co/pV7vWUFVV6 (1/3)
Just out: In a new article, we provide a comprehensive picture of perceptions of scientific authorship across domains from the perspective of the supply side (journals) as well as the demand side (researchers). @GiorgiaWithAnI https://t.co/5hAjzYLBL0