#HealthEconJA Patient-reported outcomes in stroke clinical trials 2002–2016: a systematic review https://t.co/t6hVacPCQB
RT @jpbettger: The FDA and funding agencies value patient reported outcomes. Clinical trialists should too! Only 34 of 159 stroke-related R…
The FDA and funding agencies value patient reported outcomes. Clinical trialists should too! Only 34 of 159 stroke-related RCTs in 12 high impact journals over 15 years reported PRO measures. New #systematicreview published in Quality of Life Research htt
Congratulations Mieke!
New systematic review published in Quality of Life Research finds the patient perspective is missing from most RCTs relating to stroke (125/159, 79%). Congrats to PCCU co-author @MVD @UQ_News https://t.co/apBklA9A3V
2/5 For example, a #sysreview investigating reporting of #PRO data in stroke-related #RCT-s: https://t.co/9f3YnGRqNx It again highlights the paucity of information from patients’ perspective generated and disseminated from RCTs. #cardiovascular #HRQoL