↓ Skip to main content

Relating traditional and academic ecological knowledge: mechanistic and holistic epistemologies across cultures

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Relating traditional and academic ecological knowledge: mechanistic and holistic epistemologies across cultures
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10539-018-9655-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Ludwig, Luana Poliseli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 15%
Environmental Science 12 13%
Arts and Humanities 6 7%
Philosophy 5 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 28 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,778,262
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#329
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,118
of 440,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.