↓ Skip to main content

Validation of new marker of fluid responsiveness based on Doppler assessment of blood flow velocity in superior vena cava in mechanically ventilated pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Validation of new marker of fluid responsiveness based on Doppler assessment of blood flow velocity in superior vena cava in mechanically ventilated pigs
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40635-018-0199-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomas Kovarnik, Miroslav Navratil, Jan Belohlavek, Mikulas Mlcek, Martin Chval, Zhi Chen, Stepan Jerabek, Otomar Kittnar, Ales Linhart

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Materials Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,330,630
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#171
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,605
of 340,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.