Title |
Bench Validation of a Compact Low-Flow CO2 Removal Device
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40635-018-0200-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexandra G. May, R. Garrett Jeffries, Brian J. Frankowski, Greg W. Burgreen, William J. Federspiel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 23% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Professor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 5 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,024,132
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#257
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,411
of 340,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.