↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Economics in Historical Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Comparative Economic Studies (Association for Comparative Economic Studies), October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 155)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
Title
Comparative Economics in Historical Perspective
Published in
Comparative Economic Studies (Association for Comparative Economic Studies), October 2018
DOI 10.1057/s41294-018-0076-2
Authors

Gerard Roland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,086,163
of 13,337,613 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Economic Studies (Association for Comparative Economic Studies)
#21
of 155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,893
of 336,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Economic Studies (Association for Comparative Economic Studies)
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,337,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 155 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them