↓ Skip to main content

Use of an “Intelligent Knife” (iknife), Based on the Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry Technology, for Authenticity Assessment of Pistachio Samples

Overview of attention for article published in Food Analytical Methods, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Use of an “Intelligent Knife” (iknife), Based on the Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry Technology, for Authenticity Assessment of Pistachio Samples
Published in
Food Analytical Methods, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12161-018-1386-8
Authors

Francesca Rigano, Sara Stead, Domenica Mangraviti, Renata Jandova, Davy Petit, Nino Marino, Luigi Mondello

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 38%
Unspecified 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,840,341
of 13,017,201 outputs
Outputs from Food Analytical Methods
#53
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,939
of 319,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Analytical Methods
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,017,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.