↓ Skip to main content

Condition C reconstruction, clausal ellipsis and island repair

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Condition C reconstruction, clausal ellipsis and island repair
Published in
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11049-018-9433-0
Authors

Masaya Yoshida, David Potter, Tim Hunter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2018.
All research outputs
#10,522,003
of 13,855,981 outputs
Outputs from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#114
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,602
of 359,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,855,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.