↓ Skip to main content

Practical approach to diastolic dysfunction in light of the new guidelines and clinical applications in the operating room and in the intensive care

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Practical approach to diastolic dysfunction in light of the new guidelines and clinical applications in the operating room and in the intensive care
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13613-018-0447-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Sanfilippo, S. Scolletta, A. Morelli, A. Vieillard-Baron

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 12%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 18 27%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Engineering 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,304,671
of 17,525,923 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#135
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,740
of 392,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#14
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,525,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.