↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of DTI analysis methods for clinical research: influence of pre-processing and tract selection methods

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology Experimental, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of DTI analysis methods for clinical research: influence of pre-processing and tract selection methods
Published in
European Radiology Experimental, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41747-018-0066-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Volker Ressel, Hubertus J. A. van Hedel, Ianina Scheer, Ruth O’Gorman Tuura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 31%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 31%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Psychology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#21,950,663
of 24,490,209 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology Experimental
#210
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,148
of 348,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology Experimental
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,490,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.