↓ Skip to main content

From bisphenol A to bisphenol F and a ban of mustard due to chronic low-dose exposures?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
From bisphenol A to bisphenol F and a ban of mustard due to chronic low-dose exposures?
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00204-016-1671-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel R. Dietrich, Jan G. Hengstler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Professor 2 17%
Other 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Unspecified 2 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 3 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#821,763
of 13,454,351 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#55
of 1,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,967
of 340,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,454,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.