RT @AtomsksSanakan: @DavidRoseUK Re: "Was the global warming pause really a myth?" You owe humanity an apology. https://t.co/wq6rg61Ew5 ht…
@DavidRoseUK Re: "Was the global warming pause really a myth?" You owe humanity an apology. https://t.co/wq6rg61Ew5 https://t.co/6bFSSyvr5x https://t.co/1pk3RX2n3q https://t.co/ofyIFoTmrQ https://t.co/YpdAKnC9TP https://t.co/hU1UQ56dKz https://t.co/DW8s
@hausfath Re: "Skeptics used to argue that global warming "stopped" or "paused" after 1998." And paper after paper (especially change-point analyses) showed the faux "skeptics" were wrong. Thread on that: https://t.co/ofyIFoTmrQ
#Climate CD: Regional trend changes in recent surface warming https://t.co/7AyMc8iaB7
7D/J Re: "She cherry-picks warm El Nino years like 1997/1998 and 2002, to start her supposed "pause/hiatus"." Curry also tried 2016 - 2018. She keeps moving the goalposts to defend her failed position and non-existent hiatus. 😑 https://t.co/ofyIFoTmrQ
20/J Curry abuses language to manufacture a "pause" or "hiatus": https://t.co/RZrXw14aMG But no such statistically significant "pause" or "hiatus" occurred: https://t.co/X4UpDxWxCh Thread on this: https://t.co/ofyIFoTmrQ https://t.co/e5IE38Ikkn https:/
@geoffsmithsmind Re: "Sorry, traveling so had to get the citation link" Doesn't justifying your disingenuous cherry-picking in an attempt to pretend there was no 21st century warming. Your trolling is noted. https://t.co/ofyIFoTmrQ https://t.co/DC0xO1Z
@NDPnomore @stevenmosher @brandonrgates Re: "Keep posting dimwit, your graphs show the pause" No, they don't. It's not my fault that you: 1) Suffer from end-point bias: https://t.co/uwPknto2pY 2) Don't know how to do statistical analysis, such as change
@jerry_jtaylor Re: "Remember the so-called hiatus in global warming we were hearing about a few years ago? Forget it." One in a long line of studies showing that. https://t.co/ofyIFoTmrQ
@RahulSrivathsan @lawrencewlee @IamNelsonG @Saikiran1003 @hutchinson Re: "It was told by John bates who was a NOAA scientist himself" Independent data analyses confirmed Karl et al.'s analysis: https://t.co/Ub5v0fzhsA https://t.co/ofyIFoTmrQ A formal ass
3/x Re: "chronicling+rebutting paranoia about the NOAA and T. Karl fudging data to hide a supposed "pause"" 2 updates: Thread on other papers showing no hiatus, similar to Karl et al.: https://t.co/ofyIFoTmrQ Karl et al. cleared in formal assessment: h
RT @AtomsksSanakan: PaperOfTheDay "Regional trend changes in recent surface warming" https://t.co/dhuTOLxxy3 https://t.co/Mlh5nOTF5M
@dan613 Re: "Well, I know where all the charts showing no warming are going to feature." Denialists are pretty good at cherry-picking. I also forgot to list Karl et al.'s paper, which was later vindicated: https://t.co/St9qCoeDPl https://t.co/xegiYxk8Yh
@jerry_jtaylor Re: "More on the so-called "hiatus" in global warming." There are a number of other papers that show that, when sound statistical methods are used, there is little-to-no evidence of a hiatus: https://t.co/ofyIFoTmrQ
@Gavin_Cawley @micefearboggis @theresphysics Re: "Are there any papers that do implement a statistically sound pause detector (I.e. a test for evidence of a change in the underlying rate of warming)?" I though there were a number of such recent papers. Co
PaperOfTheDay "Regional trend changes in recent surface warming" https://t.co/dhuTOLxxy3 https://t.co/Mlh5nOTF5M
Regional trend changes in recent surface warming https://t.co/OCEkgHcbxP
Regional trend changes in recent surface warming https://t.co/XQR6kAlYXs
#Climate CD: Regional trend changes in recent surface warming https://t.co/AfbC1FRkFs