↓ Skip to main content

Hemodynamic support in the early phase of septic shock: a review of challenges and unanswered questions

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Hemodynamic support in the early phase of septic shock: a review of challenges and unanswered questions
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13613-018-0449-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivier Lesur, Eugénie Delile, Pierre Asfar, Peter Radermacher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 158 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 27 17%
Student > Postgraduate 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 39 25%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,483,718
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#598
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,619
of 352,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#18
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.